The blogger of The Red White &
Blue, Emily Velazquez created a post on election day (Are You Who You Say You Are?) referring to the
discussion about the requirement of state issued identification cards
for the process of voting. In this article she described the effects
of the choice should it be enacted mostly in a negative perspective
such as party strength diminishing from excluded groups. The reasons
behind the suggested change for voting requirements is given in her
writings and have legitimate claim to why it would be done. Yet her
argument against it is listed out in a even pace though could of used
some distinct separation via line breaks.
The view was well proposed as
Democratic leaning parties would affected such as low-income,
elderly, and minority though specifics could have been added on. By
specifying particular groups and why they were more Democratic sided
would add a better understanding of why they are affiliated via the
blog post. Understanding the how of these groups the audience can
get a better grasp of the impact of the new ID ruling discussion.
The use of statistics helps fulfill the
need of reliability of the information to back the idea, a good
addition to the post. The belief that the numerical value does come
to contribute to the information is innate I believe to a general
audience. I would of liked to have seen more fleshing out of the
argument though she did an admirable job of presenting all the
information to the reader. It is in my humble opinion the post
conveyed its main point quite well though could stand to see a more
refined structure.
No comments:
Post a Comment